Order Adopting Amendment to Rule 3.1 of the General
Rules of Practice For The Superior and District Courts Supplemental To The Rules Of Civil Procedure
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32, Rule 3.1 of the General Rules Of
Practice For The Superior And District Courts Supplemental To Rules Of Civil Procedure is
hereby amended to read as in the following pages. These amended Rules shall be effective on
the 4th of March, 2004.
Adopted by the Court in conference the 4th day of March, 2004. The Appellate Division
Reporter shall publish Rule 3.1 of the General Rules Of Practice For The Superior and District
Courts Supplemental to Rules of Civil Procedure in its entirety, as amended through this action,
at the earliest practicable date.
I. Beverly Lake, C.J.
For the Court
Rule 3.1 Guidelines for Resolving Scheduling Conflicts
(a)
In resolving scheduling conflicts when an attorney has conflicting engagements in
different courts, the following priorities should ordinarily prevail:
1.
Appellate courts should prevail over trial courts.
2.
Any of the trial court matters listed in this subdivision, regardless of trial
division, should prevail over any trial court matter not listed in this
subdivision, regardless of trial division; there is no priority among the
matters listed in this subdivision:
- any trial or hearing in a capital case;
- the trial in any case designated pursuant to Rules 2.1 of
these Rules;
- the trial in a civil action that has been peremptorily set as
the first case for trial at a session of superior court;
- the trial of a criminal case in superior court, when the
defendant is in jail or when the defendant is charged with a
Class A through E felony and the trial is reasonably
expected to last for more than one week;
- the trial in an action or proceeding in district court in which
any of the following is contested:
- termination of parental rights,
- child custody,
- adjudication of abuse, neglect or dependency or disposition
following adjudication
- interim or final equitable distribution
- alimony or post-separation support
3.
When none of the above priorities applies, priority shall be as follows:
superior court, district court, magistrate's court.
(b)
When an attorney learns of a scheduling conflict between matters in the same
priority category, the attorney shall promptly give written notice to opposing
counsel, the clerk of all courts and the appropriate judges in all cases, stating
therein the circumstances relevant to resolution of the conflict under these
guidelines. When the attorney learns of the conflict before the date on which the
matters are scheduled to be heard, the appropriate judges are Senior Resident
Superior Court Judges for matters pending in the Superior Court Division and
Chief District Court Judges for matters pending in the District Court Division;
otherwise the appropriate judges are the judges presiding over those matters. Theappropriate judges should promptly confer, resolve the conflict, and notify
counsel of the resolution.
(c)
In resolving scheduling conflicts between court proceedings matters in the same
priority category the presiding judges should give consideration to the following:
- the comparative age of the cases;
- the order in which the trial dates were set by published calendar, order or
notice;
- the complexity of the cases;
- the estimated trial time;
- the number of attorneys and parties involved;
- whether the trial involves a jury;
- the difficulty or ease of rescheduling;
- the availability of witnesses, especially a child witness, an expert
witness or a witness who must travel a long distance;
-whether the trial in one of the cases had already started when the
other was scheduled to begin.
(d)
When settlement proceedings have been ordered in superior or district court
cases, only trials, hearings upon dispositive motions, and hearings upon motions
scheduled for counties with less than one court session per month shall have
precedence over settlement proceedings.
(e)
When a mediator, other neutral, or attorney learns of a scheduling conflict
between a court proceeding and a settlement proceeding, the mediator, other
neutral, unrepresented parties or attorneys shall promptly give written notice to
the appropriate judges and request them to resolve the conflict; stating therein the
circumstances relevant to a determination under (d) above.
(f)
Nothing in these guidelines is intended to prevent courts from voluntarily yielding
a favorable scheduling position, and judges of all courts are urged to
communicate with each other in an effort to lessen the impact of conflicts and
continuances on all courts.