Link to original WordPerfect file
How to access the above link?
All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the
print version appearing in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative.
NO. COA01-924
NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS
Filed: 4 June 2002
JAMES A. WELLS, Guardian for
Frank Wells,
Plaintiff, Robeson County
No. 00 CVS 3102
v
.
Cumberland County
CUMBERLAND COUNTY HOSPITAL No. 01 CvS 3279
SYSTEM, INC. and S & R HEALTH CARE,
INC., d/b/a OPEN ARMS REST HOME,
Defendants.
Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 25 April 2001 by Judge
B. Craig Ellis in Robeson County Superior Court. Heard in the
Court of Appeals 24 April 2002.
Gill & Tobias, LLP, by Douglas R. Gill; and H. Bright Lindler
for plaintiff appellant.
Patterson, Dilthey, Clay & Bryson, L.L.P., by Mark E. Anderson
and Charles George, for Cumberland County Hospital System,
Inc., defendant appellee.
McCULLOUGH, Judge.
On 18 August 2000, plaintiff James A. Wells, the guardian and
son of Frank Wells, filed a complaint in Robeson County on behalf
of his father alleging medical negligence against Cumberland County
Hospital System, Inc. (CCHS) and S & R Health Care, Inc., doing
business as Open Arms Rest Home. CCHS is a private, non-profit
corporation that operates hospitals and conducts activities in a
number of North Carolina locations, including Cumberland, Robeson,
Hoke, Bladen, Sampson, Scotland, and Harnett Counties. Among thefacilities operated by CCHS was Cape Fear Valley Medical Center in
Cumberland County, where plaintiff's father received medical
treatment in 1995. Plaintiff's complaint alleged that CCHS and
Open Arms Rest Home were negligent with Frank Wells' medical care,
causing Mr. Wells to develop severe pressure ulcers and other
ailments. Plaintiff's complaint also included claims for bad faith
retention of medical records, a pattern of willful, wanton, and
reckless abuse, and res ipsa loquitur.
On 9 October 2000, CCHS filed a document entitled Motions and
Answer of Defendant Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.
Included in the document was a motion for change of venue, which
stated:
FIRST DEFENSE -- MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE
Defendant Cumberland County Hospital
System, Inc., pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-
77, moves this Court for a change of venue to
the Superior Court of Cumberland County in
that Defendant Cumberland County Hospital
System, Inc., is a non-profit corporation
governed by the Board of Trustees appointed by
Cumberland County and, as such, is an entity
that is a public agency that must be sued in
the county where the cause of action, or some
part thereof, arose.
CCHS also provided the trial court with an affidavit from Mr.
Harold W. Maynard, the Assistant Risk Manager for Cape Fear Valley
Medical Center and a representative of CCHS. Mr. Maynard stated
that CCHS is a non-stock, non-profit corporation organized under
Chapter 55A of the North Carolina General Statutes; that it is
governed by a board of trustees appointed by the Cumberland County
Board of Commissioners; that it was established to operate andmaintain its hospital facilities as an instrumentality of
Cumberland County and to assist in planning future hospital needs
as authorized by former Chapter 131 of the North Carolina General
Statutes; and that it was authorized to act as an agent of the
State as it carried out its functions.
By order dated 25 April 2001, the trial court allowed CCHS'
motion to change venue and transferred venue from Robeson County
Superior Court to Cumberland County Superior Court. Plaintiff
appealed. Plaintiff's sole assignment of error concerns the change
of venue. Plaintiff maintains CCHS accepted and used power to
operate in a manner not available for a public agency (i.e., by
operating satellite facilities in nearby counties), and therefore
could not request a change of venue pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 1-77 (2001). After careful consideration of this matter, we
disagree with plaintiff's argument and affirm the order of the
trial court.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-77 provides:
Actions for the following causes must be
tried in the county where the cause, or some
part thereof, arose, subject to the power of
the court to change the place of trial, in the
cases provided by law:
. . . .
(2) Against a public officer or person
especially appointed to execute his
duties, for an act done by him by
virtue of his office; or against a
person who by his command or in his
aid does anything touching the
duties of such officer.
The purpose of section 1-77 is to avoid requiring public officersto 'forsake their civic duties and attend the courts of a distant
forum.' Coats v. Hospital, 264 N.C. 332, 333, 141 S.E.2d 490, 491
(1965) (quoting McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure
§ 284 (1st ed. 1929)). Furthermore, [a]ny consideration of G.S.
1-77(2) involves two questions: (1) Is defendant a 'public officer
or person especially appointed to execute his duties'? (2) In what
county did the cause of action in suit arise? Id.
I.
Plaintiff argues Chapter 131E of the North Carolina General
Statutes (formerly Chapter 131) expressly authorizes the creation
of non-profit hospital authorities closely connected to a local
government. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 131E-20 (2001) states:
(a) The territorial boundaries of a
hospital authority shall include the city or
county creating the authority and the area
within 10 miles from the territorial
boundaries of that city or county. However, a
hospital authority may engage in health care
activities in a county outside its territorial
boundaries pursuant to:
(1) An agreement with a hospital
facility if only one hospital
currently exists in that county;
(2) An agreement with any hospital if
more than one hospital currently
exists in that county; or
(3) An agreement with any health care
agency if no hospital currently
exists in that county.
In no event shall the territorial boundaries
of a hospital authority include, in whole or
in part, the area of any previously existing
hospital authority. All priorities shall be
determined on the basis of the time of
issuance of the certificates of incorporationby the Secretary of State.
(b) After the creation of an authority,
the subsequent existence within its
territorial boundaries of more than one city
or county shall in no way affect the
territorial boundaries of the authority.
Plaintiff maintains that, b ecause CCHS operates in multiple
counties, it enjoys greater powers and operates in a manner
different from that contemplated by Chapter 131E of the North
Carolina General Statutes, so that it is not an inherently public
agency under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-77(2). We disagree.
The record clearly indicates that CCHS was created on 13 June
1969, when Highsmith-Rainey Memorial Hospital, Inc., and Cape Fear
Valley Hospital, Inc., filed Articles of Merger with the Secretary
of State and merged into Cumberland County Hospital Authority, Inc.
(whose name was later changed to CCHS in October 1971). Mr.
Maynard's affidavit (referred to previously) shows that CCHS, as
organized, is a municipal hospital. See N.C. Gen. Stat.
§§ 131E-6(5) and 131E-9 (2001).
We note there are no territorial limitations applicable to
municipal hospitals under the Municipal Hospital Act. The
provision relied upon by plaintiff, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 131E-20
(2001), applies to hospital authorities organized pursuant to N.C.
Gen. Stat. §§ 131E-15 to 131E-39 (2001) (the Hospital Authorities
Act). This fact was recognized by CCHS when it issued its 1999
Articles of Amendment. Article VI was amended to read:
[CCHS] shall have and exercise all powers
granted or available to public or municipal
hospitals in North Carolina, by statute,regulation, rule, or otherwise by law,
including those powers formerly granted by
former North Carolina General Statute § 131-
98 as it existed on June 13, 1975.
Under Coats, actions against municipal or quasi-municipal
corporations or their agents are 'inherently local in their
nature.' Coats, 264 N.C. at 333, 141 S.E.2d at 491 (quoting
McIntosh § 284). Former N.C. Gen. Stat. § 131-126.28 (1981)
provided that the planning, acquisition, establishment,
development, construction, improvement, maintenance, equipment,
operation, and regulation of hospital facilities and the exercise
of any other powers herein granted to municipalities, to be
severally or jointly exercised, are hereby declared to be public
and governmental functions[.] Coats, 264 N.C. at 334, 141 S.E.2d
at 492. This provision is similar to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 131E-12
(2001), which states:
[t]he exercise of the powers, privileges
and authorities conferred on municipalities by
[the Municipal Hospital Act] are public and
government functions, exercised for a public
purpose and matters of public necessity. In
the case of a county, the exercise of the
powers, privileges and authorities conferred
by [the Municipal Hospital Act] is a county
function and purpose, as well as a public and
governmental function. In the case of any
municipality other than a county, the exercise
of the powers, privileges, and authorities
conferred by [the Municipal Hospital Act] is
a municipal function and purpose, as well as a
public and governmental function.
In Coats, plaintiffs were residents of Harnett County who sued
to recover money allegedly due them for materials and labor they
provided toward the construction of Sampson County MemorialHospital. Coats, 264 N.C. at 332, 141 S.E.2d at 491. Sampson
County Memorial Hospital was a non-stock, non-profit corporation
governed by a board of trustees who were appointed by the Sampson
County Board of Commissioners. Sampson County delegated to the
hospital the authority to maintain and operate hospital facilities.
Id. In the present case, CCHS was the same type of corporation,
governed by a board of trustees who were appointed by the
Cumberland County Board of Commissioners. We discern no
organizational differences between the hospital in Coats and CCHS.
Therefore, we conclude CCHS qualifies as a public officer under
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-77(2), and venue was properly changed from
Robeson County to Cumberland County.
II.
'A broad, general rule applied or stated in many cases is
that the cause of action arises in the county where the acts or
omissions constituting the basis of the action occurred.'
Coats,
264 N.C. at 334, 141 S.E.2d at 492 (quoting Annot., Venue Of
Actions Or Proceedings Against Public Officers, 48 A.L.R. 2d 423,
432).
See also Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303, 222 S.E.2d 412
(1976). In the present case, plaintiff's cause of action arose in
Cumberland County because Frank Wells was treated at Cape Fear
Valley Medical Center in Cumberland County and plaintiff alleged no
acts or omissions in other locations. A party is bound by his
pleadings and, unless withdrawn, amended, or otherwise altered, the
allegations contained in all pleadings ordinarily are conclusive as
against the pleader. He cannot subsequently take a positioncontradictory to his pleadings.
Davis v. Rigsby, 261 N.C. 684,
686, 136 S.E.2d 33, 34 (1964).
We conclude CCHS is a municipal corporation, and therefore, a
public officer under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-77(2). Venue was properly
changed from Robeson County to Cumberland County, where plaintiff's
cause of action occurred.
The order of the trial court transferring venue to Cumberland
County is hereby
Affirmed.
Judges WYNN and BIGGS concur.
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***