A decision without a published opinion is authority only in the case in which such decision is rendered and should not be cited in any other case in any court for any other purpose, nor should any court consider any such decision for any purpose except in the case in which such decision is rendered. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 30 (e)(3).

NO. COA01-812

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

Filed: 5 February 2002

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

    v.                             Wake County
                                Nos. 00 CRS 55659,
DWIGHT DANIEL EPPS                        00 CRS 57809

    Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 15 February 2001 by Judge David Q. LaBarre in Wake County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 31 December 2001.

    Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General LaShawn L. Strange, for the State.

    John T. Hall for defendant-appellant.

    
    EAGLES, Chief Judge.
    Defendant Dwight Daniel Epps was convicted of robbery with a dangerous weapon and admitted to being an habitual felon. Defendant was sentenced to a term of 151 to 191 months imprisonment. Defendant appeals.
    Counsel appointed to represent defendant has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal and asks that this Court conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. Counsel has also shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665(1985), by advising defendant of his right to file written arguments with this Court and providing him with the documents necessary to do so.
    Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own behalf with this Court and a reasonable time in which he could have done so has passed. In accordance with Anders, we have fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear therefrom. We have been unable to discern any possible prejudicial error and conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous.
    No error.
    Judges TIMMONS-GOODSON and McCULLOUGH concur.
    Report per Rule 30(e).

*** Converted from WordPerfect ***