PROGRESSIVE LIGHTING, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v
.
HISTORIC DESIGNS, INC.,
Defendant.
Helms, Henderson & Associates, by Christian R. Troy, for
plaintiff-appellee.
Ferguson and Scarbrough, P.A., by James E. Scarbrough, for
defendant-appellant.
MARTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking to recover a sum certain
plus interest due on a statement of account for goods sold to
defendant. Defendant, a North Carolina corporation, filed an
answer, appearing pro se through its corporate secretary, who is
not an attorney. Plaintiff moved to strike the answer as being in
violation of G.S. § 84-5 and to enter a default judgment against
defendant. On 23 July 2001, the district court granted the motion
to strike the defendant's answer, but denied the motion for default
judgment; defendant was given thirty days within which to file an
answer through an attorney. Upon defendant's failure to file an
answer, default judgment in favor of plaintiff was entered by the
clerk of superior court on 12 March 2002. Defendant gave notice ofappeal to this Court from the default judgment entered by the
clerk.
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***