A judgment was arrested where the court attempted to revoke defendant's probation after
the probation period expired without findings or evidence of a reasonable effort to conduct the
hearing earlier. N.C.G.S. § 15A-1344(f).
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Associate Attorney General
Wendy L. Greene, for the State.
Leslie C. Rawls for the defendant-appellant.
WYNN, Judge.
Under State v. Camp, 299 N.C. 524, 528, 263 S.E.2d 592, 594-95
(1980), to revoke a defendant's probation after the period of
probation has expired, the trial court must find that the State
had 'made reasonable effort . . . to conduct the hearing earlier.'
(citing N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(f))
(See footnote 1)
. In this case, althoughdefendant's probation period ended on 17 May 2002, the trial court
conducted a hearing on 19 August 2002--after the expiration of
defendant's period of probation and suspension. Because the record
shows that the trial court did not make any findings (nor is there
evidence in the record to support such findings) that the State
made reasonable effort to conduct the hearing earlier, we are
compelled by State v. Camp to hold that jurisdiction was lost by
the lapse of time and the court had no power to enter a revocation
judgment against defendant. Id. Accordingly, as in Camp, the
judgment appealed from is arrested and defendant is discharged.
Judgment arrested.
Judges TYSON and LEVINSON concur.
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***