STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHNNY RAY CANELLAS
NO. COA03-192
Filed: 15 June 2004
1. Sentencing--habitual felon--prior record level--prior conviction--prayer for
judgment continued
The trial court did not err in a felony breaking and entering and habitual felon case by
calculating defendant's prior record level by adding one point for the prayer for judgment
continued on the assault on a female charge, because: (1) the North Carolina Structured
Sentencing Statute under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.11(7) provides that a person has a prior
conviction when, on the date a criminal judgment is entered, the person being sentenced has been
previously convicted of a crime; and (2) N.C.G.S. § 15A-1331(b) provides that for the purpose of
imposing sentence, a person has been convicted when he has been adjudged guilty or has entered
a plea of guilty or no contest, and the Court of Appeals has determined that formal entry of
judgment is not required in order to have a conviction.
2. Appeal and Error--preservation of issues--constitutional issue--failure to raise at
trial
Although defendant contends in a felony breaking and entering and habitual felon case
that N.C.G.S. § 15A-1331(b) is unconstitutional, defendant failed to properly preserve this issue
for appellate review because defendant failed to raise this issue at trial.
Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 10 June 2002 by
Judge Wiley F. Bowen in Lee County Superior Court. Heard in the
Court of Appeals 2 December 2003.
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General
Christopher W. Brooks, for the State.
Mark A. Key and Penny K. Bell, attorneys for the defendant-
appellant.
TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.
Johnny Ray Canellas (defendant) appeals his sentence of 151
months to 191 months imprisonment following his plea of guilty to
two counts of felony breaking and entering and admission of
habitual felon status. The sentence is to begin at the expiration
of any and all sentences that defendant is currently serving. For
the reasons stated herein, we affirm the decision of the trialcourt.
The factual and procedural history of this case is as follows:
On 11 November 1999, defendant was convicted of assault on a female
and received a prayer for judgment continued on the condition that
he enroll in a domestic violence program for 18 months. Defendant
was indicted by the Lee County Grand Jury on 25 February 2002 on
the following charges: felony breaking and entering; felony
larceny; felony possession of stolen property; and attaining
habitual felon status. The Harnett County Grand Jury indicted
defendant on the additional charges of two counts each of felony
breaking and entering, felony larceny, and felony possession of
stolen property. After defendant's Harnett County cases were
transferred to Lee County for disposition, defendant tendered a
plea of guilty on 10 June 2002 to two counts of felony breaking and
entering and admitted his status as an habitual felon.
Pursuant to the plea agreement, the State dismissed all of the
remaining charges. Defendant had numerous prior convictions which
included the prayer for judgment continued on the charge of assault
on a female. At defendant's sentencing hearing, the State
contended that defendant's prior convictions amounted to fifteen
prior record level points. Defendant contended that his prior
convictions allow for only fourteen prior record level points and
that his prayer for judgment continued on the assault on a female
charge should not count toward the trial court's prior record level
determination. The trial court assessed defendant fifteen prior
record level points and ordered him to serve 151 months to 191
months in prison. It is from this sentence that defendant appeals.
_________________________________________
The issues presented on appeal are (I) whether the trial court
erred in calculating defendant's prior record level, and (II)
whether N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1331(b) is unconstitutional on its
face or as applied to defendant.
As an initial matter, we note that defendant failed to cite to
the assignments of error on the record in his appellate brief. The
Rules of Appellate Procedure require that "[i]mmediately following
each question presented shall be a reference to the assignments of
error pertinent to the question, identified by their numbers and by
the pages at which they appear in the printed record on appeal.
N.C. R. App. P. 28(b)(6) (2004). [A]ssignments of error not set
out in the appellant's brief, or in support of which no reason or
argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned.
Id. The failure to comply with Rule 28 subjects defendant's appeal
to dismissal.
Northwood Homeowners Assn., Inc. v. Town of Chapel
Hill, 112 N.C. App. 630, 632, 436 S.E.2d 282, 283 (1993). However,
pursuant to Rule 2 of the N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, we
nonetheless consider the merits of defendant's arguments. N.C. R.
App. P. 2 (2004) ([T]o expedite decision in the public interest
[the Court of Appeals] may. . . suspend or vary the requirements or
provisions of any of [the Rules of Appellate Procedure] in a case
pending before it. . . upon its own initiative.).
[1] Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in
calculating defendant's prior record level by adding one point for
the prayer for judgment continued on the assault on a female
charge. We disagree. The North Carolina Structured Sentencing Statutes provide that
"[a] person has a prior conviction when, on the date a criminal
judgment is entered, the person being sentenced has been previously
convicted of a crime." N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.11(7)(2003).
"For the purpose of imposing sentence, a person has been convicted
when he has been adjudged guilty or has entered a plea of guilty or
no contest." N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1331(b) (2003). Furthermore,
this Court has interpreted N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1331(b) to mean
that formal entry of judgment is not required in order to have a
conviction."
State v. Hatcher, 136 N.C. App. 524, 527, 524 S.E.2d
815, 817 (2000).
In the case at bar, defendant tendered a plea of guilty to a
charge of assault on a female in November 1999 and asked the trial
court to continue judgment. Defendant was granted the prayer for
judgment continued on the condition that he attend a domestic
violence program for 18 months. There is no evidence in the record
to suggest that defendant did not complete the domestic violence
program. Thus, we presume that defendant met the conditions of his
prayer for judgment continued. Therefore, pursuant to N.C. Gen.
Stat. § 15A-1331 and this Court's holding in
Hatcher, we hold that
defendant's prayer for judgment continued in the assault on a
female case is a prior conviction for sentencing purposes.
Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court did not err by
considering the assault conviction for the purpose of prior record
level sentencing.
[2] Next, defendant argues that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1331(b)
is unconstitutional. It is well established that to challenge theconstitutionality of an issue on appeal, the party must raise the
issue at trial.
State v. Benson, 323 N.C. 318, 322, 372 S.E.2d
517, 519 (1988).
Defendant failed to demonstrate that he raised
the constitutionality of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1331 at trial,
thus defendant failed to properly preserve this issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, we decline to address defendant's
constitutionality argument.
For the reasons stated above, we hold that the trial court
did not err in determining defendant's sentence.
AFFIRMED.
Judges WYNN and MCCULLOUGH concur.
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***