STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v. Mecklenburg County
No. 02 CRS 211505
LAVANT VOLTAIRE WASHINGTON
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General
Scott T. Stroud, for the State.
David J. P. Barber, for defendant-appellant.
CALABRIA, Judge.
Lavant Voltaire Washington (defendant) was charged with
possession of a firearm by a felon. The State presented evidence
which tended to show: On the night of 14 March 2002, Officer J. M.
Rendon (Officer Rendon) of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police
Department responded to a call that there were three black men
looking into cars in a parking lot across the street from 101
Kingsford Drive. Upon arriving at the scene, Officer Rendon
observed two black men in the parking lot. As he got out of his
car, the two men began walking. Officer Rendon asked both males to
stop, but the defendant walked past him. The officer yelled for
defendant to stop, but defendant kept walking. Defendant looked asif he was trying to hide something on the right side of his body,
and he walked to a tree and placed something silver behind it.
Officer Rendon, with the help of another officer on the scene, then
stopped and detained defendant.
Officer Rendon then walked over to the tree and found behind
it a gun with a silver barrel. No other items were behind the
tree. Officer Rendon secured the gun and locked it inside of his
patrol vehicle. Officer Rendon then placed defendant under arrest
and performed a search incident to arrest. Officer Rendon
discovered ten bullets in defendant's coat pocket. While Officer
Rendon was trying to put defendant into the police vehicle,
defendant physically resisted and began cursing at Officer Rendon.
While being transported to the police station, the defendant said,
"I'll carry a gun for as long as I live." At the end of trial, the
defendant stipulated that he had a prior felony conviction. The
jury found defendant guilty as charged, and the trial court
sentenced him to a term of 20-24 months' imprisonment. Defendant
appeals.
I. Denial of Motion to Dismiss
On appeal, defendant argues the trial court erred in failing
to grant his motion to dismiss. Specifically, defendant contends
that there was insufficient evidence that he was in possession of
the gun. We disagree. The standard for review for a motion to
dismiss premised upon insufficient evidence was recently reiterated
in State v. Alexander:
Upon a defendant's motion to dismiss, the
court must consider whether the State haspresented substantial evidence of each
essential element of the crime charged.
Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence
that a reasonable mind might accept as
sufficient to support a conclusion. In
examining the evidence, the court must view
any contradictions or discrepancies in the
light most favorable to the State, allowing
all reasonable inferences to be drawn
therefrom.
152 N.C. App. 701, 705, 568 S.E.2d 317, 319 (2002) (citations
omitted).
Possession can be either actual or constructive. State v.
Boyd, 154 N.C. App. 302, 307, 572 S.E.2d 192, 196 (2002). This
Court has explained,
Constructive possession of contraband material
exists when there is no actual personal
dominion over the material, but there is an
intent and capability to maintain control and
dominion over it. Where sufficient
incriminating circumstances exist,
constructive possession of the contraband
materials may be inferred even where
possession of the premises is nonexclusive.
Evidence placing the accused within close
proximity to the contraband may support a
jury's conclusion that the contraband was in
the accused's possession, thereby justifying
the denial of a motion to dismiss.
State v. Kraus, 147 N.C. App. 766, 770, 557 S.E.2d 144, 147-48
(2001) (citations omitted).
In the case sub judice, defendant continued walking after the
police ordered him to stop, attempted to hide something on the
right side of his body, walked over to a tree, and placed something
silver behind it. Shortly thereafter, Officer Rendon discovered a
gun with a silver barrel behind the tree. Later, during a search
incident to arrest, ten bullets were found in defendant's coatpocket, and while being transported to the police station defendant
stated, "I'll carry a gun for as long as I live." In the light
most favorable to the State, we hold that there was substantial
evidence that defendant had possession of the gun such that the
trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss.
No error.
Judges TIMMONS-GOODSON and LEVINSON concur.
Report per Rule 30(e).
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***