STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v. Henderson County
No. 03 CRS 2147
03 CRS 56185-86
WILLIAM BUTCH ROBINSON 03 CRS 56203
&nb
sp;
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General
John P. Scherer II, for the State.
Allen W. Boyer for defendant-appellant.
ELMORE, Judge.
Defendant was found guilty of attempted first degree murder,
assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious
injury, robbery with a dangerous weapon and conspiracy to commit
robbery with a dangerous weapon. He was sentenced to a minimum
term of 220 months and maximum term of 273 months for attempted
first degree murder, a minimum term of 116 months and a maximum
term of 149 months for assault with a deadly weapon with intent to
kill inflicting serious injury, and to a minimum term of 103 to 133
months for the remaining convictions.
The State presented evidence tending to show that on 10
October 2002, Ms. Aruna Patel, operator of the Star Motel in
Henderson County, North Carolina, answered the doorbell of themotel office and saw defendant and Jason Anders standing at the
door. Defendant, wearing a ski mask and holding a knife in his
hand, forced his way into the office. He grabbed Ms. Patel and
struck her head five or six times. As Ms. Patel attempted to reach
for a telephone, defendant threw her to the floor. He held her
head and cut her around the throat and neck. Defendant seized
$254.00 in cash from the cash box and ran from the office.
Ms. Patel was subsequently transported to a hospital where she
underwent emergency surgery to her throat and neck. Her trachea
was nearly severed in half. She was hospitalized for twelve days.
Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that his convictions
and punishment for both attempted first degree murder and assault
with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury
violated the bar against double jeopardy. The North Carolina
Supreme Court held in State v. Tirado, 358 N.C. 551, 579, 599
S.E.2d 515, 534 (2004) that attempted first degree murder and
assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious
injury are two separate offenses and that separate conviction and
punishment for both is not a violation of the constitutional
prohibition against punishing a person twice for the same offense.
We hold that Tirado decision is controlling and binding in this
case. This assignment of error is overruled.
No error.
Judges BRYANT and GEER concur.
Report per Rule 30(e).
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***