An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.
NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS
Filed: 19 July 2005
IN THE MATTER OF J.D. Sampson County
Appeal by juvenile from disposition order filed 10 March 2004
by Judge William M. Cameron in Sampson County District Court.
Heard in the Court of Appeals 13 June 2005.
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Ann
Stone, for the State.
Appellate Defender Staples S. Hughes, by Assistant Appellate
Defender Kelly D. Miller, for juvenile-appellant.
(See footnote 1)
(juvenile) appeals his disposition order filed 10 March
2004, entered consistent with an adjudication order finding him
guilty of committing the misdemeanor offense of injury to personal
property, placing him on probation for 12 months and ordering him
to pay restitution in the amount of $465.26 within 12 months.
The juvenile's sole argument on appeal is the court erred by
ordering restitution in the absence of findings of fact showing:
(1) he had the means to pay restitution, and (2) the payment ofrestitution is in his best interests
(See footnote 2)
The State appropriately concedes that In re Heil
App. 24, 33, 550 S.E.2d 815, 822 (2001), mandates the disposition
order be vacated and the matter remanded for findings of fact as to
whether payment of restitution is in the juvenile's best interest
and whether the juvenile has the ability to pay restitution. In
accord with the mandate of Heil
, the disposition order is vacated
and remanded for findings of fact.
Vacated and remanded for additional findings of fact.
Judges ELMORE and GEER concur.
Report per Rule 30(e).
Initials have been used throughout to protect the identity of
The juvenile does not bring forward any assignments of error
relating to the adjudication order.
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***