STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Cumberland County
Nos. 02 CRS 57998-58001
v.
 
;
HARLAN ALLEN HEINTZ
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Amy
C. Kunstling
Appellate Defender Staples Hughes, by Assistant Appellate
Defender Barbara S. Blackman
LEVINSON, Judge.
Defendant appeals from judgments and commitments entered upon
his guilty pleas to four counts of taking indecent liberties with
a child; three counts of first degree statutory rape; three counts
of first degree statutory sexual offense; three counts of felonious
child abuse; four counts of felonious incest; one count of second
degree forcible rape; and one count of second degree forciblesexual offense. For sentencing, one count each of first degree
statutory rape and first degree statutory sexual offense were
consolidated for judgments in 00 CRS 57998, 00 CRS 57999, and 00
CRS 58000. The remaining counts were consolidated for judgment in
00 CRS 58001.
Defendant argues that, with respect to the judgments on the
first degree statutory rape and first degree statutory sexual
offense, the trial court erred by sentencing him in excess of the
statutory maximum based on aggravating factors not submitted to the
jury and not admitted by defendant. Defendant argues he is
entitled to a new sentencing hearing pursuant to Blakely v.
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403, reh'g denied, __ U.S.
__, 159 L. Ed. 2d 851 (2004). We agree.
With respect to the relevant judgments, the trial court made
statutory finding number 15 that [t]he defendant took advantage of
a position of trust or confidence to commit the offense, and a
non-statutory factor that [t]he victim of this offense suffered
serious injury both mental and emotional permanent and
debilitating. The trial court found that these aggravating
factors outweighed mitigating factors 11, 14 and 19 set forth in
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.16 (2003), and sentenced defendant to
aggravated terms of imprisonment.
The aggravating factors were not
found beyond a reasonable doubt by the jury, and were not admittedby defendant. Therefore, we remand for resentencing of those
offenses consolidated for judgment in 00 CRS 57998, 00 CRS 57999,
and 00 CRS 58000 in conformity with the rulings in Blakely and
State v. Allen, 359 N.C. 425, 615 S.E.2d 256 (2005).
We do not disturb the judgment entered in 00 CRS 58001, except
to the extent we instruct the trial court judge to correct a
clerical error in that judgment. The judgment in 00 CRS 58001
directs that the sentence imposed therein shall begin at the
expiration of the sentence imposed in 02 CRS 58000. However, this
conflicts with the trial court's decree in open court that it run
concurrently with the term of imprisonment required by 00 CRS
58000.
Remanded for resentencing.
Judges McCULLOUGH and ELMORE concur.
Report per Rule 30(e).
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***