STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v. Buncombe County
No. 03 CRS 60414
ABRAHAM ADAMS,
Defendant.
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General
Yvonne B. Ricci, for the State.
Douglas L. Hall, for defendant-appellant.
WYNN, Judge.
Under
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493,
reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), and State v.
Kinch, 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), we thoroughly examined
the record on appeal and found no issues of arguable merit.
Defendant Abraham Adams
appeals from judgment entered
consistent with a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving while
license revoked.
The trial court sentenced Defendant to ninety
days in the custody of the Buncombe County Sheriff
.
Defendant's counsel states that after examination of the
record and review of the law, he is unable to identify issues “of
sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief onappeal”
and asks this Court to
review the record for possible
prejudicial error.
Counsel has shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he
has complied with the requirements of Anders, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.
Ed. 2d 493, and Kinch, 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665, by advising
Defendant of his right to file written arguments with this Court
and providing him with documents necessary for him to do so.
Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own behalf
with this Court, and a reasonable time in which he could have done
so has passed.
In accordance with Anders, we must fully examine the record to
determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear therefrom or
whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. We conclude the appeal is
wholly frivolous. In reaching this conclusion, we have conducted
our own examination of the record for possible prejudicial error
and have found none.
Affirmed.
Judges MCGEE and HUNTER concur.
Report per Rule 30(e).
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***