An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

NO. COA06-456

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

Filed: 3 October 2006

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

    v.                        Moore County
                            Nos. 05 CRS 52548 - 52549
TAJSHUA RENEE MCCRIMMON

    Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 18 August 2005 by Judge James M. Webb in Moore County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 29 September 2006.

    Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Yvonne B. Ricci, for the State.

    Irving Joyner, for defendant-appellant.

    TYSON, Judge.

    Tajshua Reneee McCrimmon (“defendant”) appeals from judgments entered after defendant pled guilty to two counts of financial card theft. Under a plea agreement, defendant agreed to “be placed on probation upon terms deemed proper by the court.” Defendant appeals after she was sentenced to consecutive suspended sentences of six to eight months imprisonment and placed on probation. We affirm.

I. Anders Review
    Counsel appointed to represent defendant asserts he has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal. He asks this Court to conduct our own review of the record for possible prejudicialerror. Counsel has shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising defendant of her right to file written arguments with this Court and providing her with the documents necessary to do so. Defendant has not filed any written arguments with this Court. A reasonable time for her to have done so has passed.
II. Conclusion
    As provided by Anders, we have fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear thereon. We find no possible prejudicial error and affirm the judgments of the trial court.
    Affirmed.
    Judges BRYANT and LEVINSON concur.
    Report per Rule 30(e).

*** Converted from WordPerfect ***