All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative.

DAVID P. REYNOLDS

v.

CYNTHIA W. REYNOLDS (now FLYNN)
-----------------------
CYNTHIA FLYNN (formerly REYNOLDS)

v.

DAVID P. REYNOLDS

    Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 147 N.C. App. 566, 557 S.E.2d 126 (2001), vacating in part and affirming in part an order entered 30 August 1999 by Jones (William G.), J., in District Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 September 2002.
    James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A., by William K. Diehl, Jr. and Preston O. Odom, III, for appellant Cynthia Flynn (formerly Reynolds).

    Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes, P.A., by Thomas R. Cannon and Kary C. Watson, for appellee David Reynolds.

    PER CURIAM.

    For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
    REVERSED.

*** Converted from WordPerfect ***