All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 131PA03

FILED: 6 FEBRUARY 2004

JOSEPH HUMMEL

    v.

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA and THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA d/b/a THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL

    On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 156 N.C. App. 108, 576 S.E.2d 124 (2003), affirming an opinion and award entered by the North Carolina Industrial Commission on 14 January 2002. Heard in the Supreme Court 8 December 2003.
    Law Office of Martin A. Rosenberg, by Martin A. Rosenberg, for plaintiff-appellant.

    Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Thomas Ziko and Robert T. Hargett, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for defendant-appellees.

    PER CURIAM.

    DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

*** Converted from WordPerfect ***