All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative.

DIANA MAE PATAKY

    v.

KENNETH PATAKY

    Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 160 N.C. App. 289, 585 S.E.2d 404 (2003), reversing and remanding an Order entered 30 November 2001 by Judge William L. Daisy in District Court, Guilford County. On 5 February 2004, the Supreme Court allowed discretionary review of an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 September 2004.
    Nix & Cecil, by Lee M. Cecil, for plaintiff-appellant.

    Joyce L. Terres for defendant-appellee.

    PER CURIAM.
    As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
    AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

*** Converted from WordPerfect ***