All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative.
PER CURIAM.
Although the Court of Appeals addressed several issues
in its opinion, we allowed review solely for consideration of
whether the trial court's finding of defendant's probationary
status constituted error under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S.
296, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004), and whether defendant had
knowingly and voluntarily stipulated to his probationary status.
The decision of the Court of Appeals to remand for resentencing
is reversed, and we remand this case to that court for
reconsideration of these two issues in light of our decisions in
State v. Hurt, 361 N.C. 325, 330, 643 S.E.2d 915, 918 (2007)
(holding a judge may not find an aggravating factor on the basis
of a defendant's admission unless that defendant personally or
through counsel admits the necessary facts or admits that the
aggravating factor is applicable) and State v. Blackwell, 361N.C. 41, 44, 49-51, 638 S.E.2d 452, 455, 458-59 (2006)
(explaining that Blakely error is subject to harmless error
review), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, ___ L. Ed. 2d ___, 75
U.S.L.W. 3609 (2007). The Court of Appeals opinion remains
undisturbed in all other respects.
REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***