All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative.
MAGNOLIA MANUFACTURING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
v.
ERIE INSURANCE
EXCHANGE, ERIE INSURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, and ERIE
INSURANCE GROUP
The Court of Appeals decision that summary judgment was improperly entered in
favor of defendant insurer in plaintiff's action to recover under a business insurance policy for loss
of business income as a result of roof collapse during replacement was reversed for the reasons
stated in the dissenting opinion that the undisputed evidence showed that plaintiff's losses were
caused by a poorly maintained roof and during work to repair or replace it, and that losses from
collapse caused by faulty or inadequate maintenance or during construction were expressly
excluded from coverage under the policy.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the
decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 179 N.C.
App. ___, 633 S.E.2d 841 (2006), affirming in part and reversing
in part an order granting summary judgment for defendants and
denying summary judgment for plaintiff entered on 20 April 2005
by Judge Michael R. Morgan in Superior Court, Orange County, and
remanding for further proceedings. Heard in the Supreme Court 10
January 2007.
The Brough Law Firm, by Robert E. Hornik, Jr., for
plaintiff-appellee.
Bailey & Dixon, L.L.P., by David S. Coats, for
defendant-appellants.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the
decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.
Chief Justice PARKER and Justice HUDSON did not
participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
*** Converted from WordPerfect ***